No probe into illegal adoption files

I have been asking about an audit of adoption files for six years now. Despite revelation after revelation, the HSE, AAI, DCYA and Tusla deem these records not worth auditing. I wonder why. Here in 2010, the HSE took three months to respond – even then not answering the specific questions I posed. This is four years before Tuam.


THE Adoption Board has said it has no intention of inspecting all adoption files held by the HSE and private adoption agencies, despite the HSE admitting some files contain evidence of illegal birth registrations.

The revelation comes after the Irish Examiner queried the HSE concerning an entry on its website.

“After the introduction of legal adoption in Ireland in 1952, some children’s births were registered directly into the name of the ‘adoptive’ parents. This practice had the effect of removing all reference to the natural parents from the official record and also meant the Adoption Board had no record of the case, as there had been no legal adoption. Some adoption agencies have records in relation to these,” states the entry.

It is a crime to falsely register a birth. The result of such practices meant some children were raised believing they were the natural child of their ‘parents’ when, in fact, they were falsely registered and illegally adopted.

In some cases, this was facilitated by adoption agencies, some of which remain accredited by the Adoption Board to this day.

The Irish Examiner asked the HSE if any of the files showing illegal birth registrations were now in the possession of the HSE and, if so, had it informed the Adoption Board about such files.


A response was issued by the HSE after three months, in which it failed to answer any of the questions put to it.

“The HSE did receive files from a number of agencies when they ceased to operate. These files have been stored and are available to be reopened, as required. If the HSE receives a request to access the file from an individual who was adopted, this can be facilitated. Similarly, if information comes to light to suggest that an adoption was illegally registered this can be investigated further. However, it is important to note that if an adoption was illegally registered, this fact is not normally noted in the adoption file,” a statement read.

Despite its knowledge that some adoption files contain evidence of illegal registrations, the Adoption Board said it had never contacted or inspected any files held by the HSE.

The Adoption Board also said it has “no plans” to inspect the files of all adoption agencies and the HSE “within its current work schedule”.

Susan Lohan of the Adoption Rights Alliance said the Adoption Board’s response to the issue was grounds for every member of the authority to resign.

“The fact that the HSE knows the details of adoption agencies which participated in illegal adoptions and that the Adoption Board has no intention to inspect these files to even quantify the extent of the problem is surely grounds for every single member of the board to resign,” said Ms Lohan.

Chairwoman of Adoption Loss – The Natural Parents Network of Ireland, Bernie Harold, called for a full audit of all the files in each of the private and HSE adoption departments in the State to discover the extent of such practices.

“The only body which has the right to inspect every single file in any registered adoption agency is the Adoption Board. We hereby call on the Minister for Children Barry Andrews to issue an instruction to the board to carry out a complete audit of all the files in each of the private and HSE adoption departments in the state,” she said.


5 thoughts on “No probe into illegal adoption files”

  1. There is never a probe into illegal adoption files. Meet the new Adoption Authority – same as the old Adoption Board…


    1. Thanks for that irishmansdiary. Even when I find clear evidence in files and write about, I keep being told an audit would be of little value as there’s little information on the files. How can they say that when (a) they’ve never done an audit and (b) every time I get my hands on material, it contradicts such a statement. Of course, an audit would maybe shed some light on areas that the State would much rather remain in the dark…


      1. But it isn’t in the dark. We (anyone involved in adoption, no matter what part of the triad, or the state, or the agencies) all know what went on, and what agencies were responsible, and what social workers and nuns in each agency and mother and baby home were responsible for what.

        I used to think it was being kept covered up to protect the RC Church (most agencies being very explicitly Catholic agencies), but it’s been written about for over 20 years now. Illegal adoptions, de facto adoptions, vaccine trials, babies exported, Magdalene Laundries… it’s all in the public domain at this stage. We’re not going to sue, we just want honesty and answers.

        Liked by 1 person

      2. I agree absolutely. However, the scale of the illegal adoptions is certainly new, in terms of the State acknowledgement.
        In terms of deaths, the possible falsification of deaths, and the discrepancy in numbers reported to the State and kept privately, that’s certainly something that’s only emerging in the past year .
        From what I can see, and from my own work, I think there is far more to emerge.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s